United States v. Ramos
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARDONE, District Judge.
On this day, the Court considered Defendants Ignacio Ramos, Jr.’s and Jose Alonso Compean’s Motion for New Trial (“Motion”). Having reviewed the record, Defendants’ Motion (Doc. 179) is hereby DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 8, 2006, a unanimous jury found Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos, Jr. and Jose Alonso Compean guilty of Assault with a Dangerous Weapon and Aiding and Abetting under 18 U.S.C. 113(a)(3), among other crimes. The judge polled each juror individually, confirming the unanimity of the verdict. On March 17, 2006, Defendant Ramos filed a motion to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Wayne Earl EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Pablo Salinas Brito Adrian Brito Jesus Salinas Brito Adan Brito Ignacio Berumez Brito Benjamin Hernandez RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Norton Edward Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008