Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Darling v. Darling

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 6, 2017No. 2160378Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Judge

I concur in that part of the main opinion reversing the judgment of the Pickens Circuit Court ("the trial court") insofar as it fails to explicitly state its reasons for not awarding child support. 252 So.3d at 1095. I respectfully dissent to the remaining aspects of the opinion.

In its judgment divorcing Sherry Denise Darling ("the wife") and Raymon Devell Darling ("the husband"), the trial court, among other things, awarded the parties joint legal and physical custody of the parties' minor child (see discussion in main opinion addressing custody award, 252 So.3d at 1095), and divided the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Radiola v. RadiolaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API