Legal Opinion

Santos v. Annikos

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 4, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00281Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 RONALD R. SANTOS, Case No. 3:23-cv-00281-MMD-CSD 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 KENNETH ANNIKOS, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 I. SUMMARY 12 Pro se Plaintiff Ronald Santos, who is incarcerated in the custody of the Nevada 13 Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), sued prison officials and medical personnel under 14 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they violated his Constitutional rights because they were 15 deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, retaliated against him, and 16 intentionally took his property. (ECF Nos. 6…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. E3 Biofuels, LLC v. Biothane, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API