Legal Opinion

State v. Kirk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 21, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITE, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal under Rule 9 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure to determine whether the prosecutor abused his discretion in denying pretrial diversion. The trial court affirmed the denial. For the reasons set forth, the judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

The appellant, Charles Floyd Kirk, was charged with four alternate counts of aggravated assault and one count of carrying a weapon with intent to go armed. The victim, Shawn Lawless, was a sixteen year old friend of appellant’s fourteen year old…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Boyce v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. HerronTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. MarkhamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HooperTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. LutryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  3. State v. BrooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  4. State v. Jack RobertsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. State v. Kalid AbdulahiCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API