Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Siegel

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

Decided January 19, 1970No. 27Published

1Opinion of the Court

SWEET, P. J.,

Defendant and the district attorney have each filed an answer in this matter. It was agreed at a meeting, Thursday, January 15, 1970, among Milton Rosenberg, Esq., Sherman Siegel, Esq., First Assistant District Attorney Bell and myself, that the record would consist, in addition to papers first filed, of the basic order of January 9th, the motion to disqualify, and these two answers, no oral testimony being necessary.

The district attorney has reported that on December 19, 1969, “counsel for the defendant notified the District Attorney’s office that the defendant . . . would plead…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. VivianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Holly v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API