Goldman v. Finkel
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
The parties were formerly husband and wife. This bill in equity is to establish that the plaintiff is the sole owner of a piece of real estate in Medford purchased on October 15, 1940, before they were divorced. The judge, under Gr. L. c. 214, § 23, made a report of the material facts found by him. From a final decree declaring that the plaintiff is the sole owner, and enjoining the defendant from proceeding with a petition for partition in the Probate Court for Middlesex County, the defendant appealed.
The judge found that the purchase money was furnished by the plaintiff entirely from his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Saulnier v. SaulnierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- McPherson v. McPhersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Charest v. St. OngeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blanchette v. BlanchetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Osborne v. OsborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Ross v. RossMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Feinman v. LombardoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Robinson v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.