Legal Opinion
Francis v. Board of Pardons & Paroles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 16, 2021No. SC20377PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
September 28, 2021 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 39
338 Conn. 347
SEPTEMBER, 2021 347 Francis v. Board of Pardons & Paroles ERNEST FRANCIS v. BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES ET AL. (SC 20377) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Vertefeuille, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 54-125g), ‘‘any person who has six months or less to the expiration of the maximum term or terms for which such person was sentenced’’ is eligible ‘‘to go at large on parole . . . after having served ninety-five per cent of the definite sentence imposed.’’ The plaintiff, who had been convicted of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Milford Power Co v. Alstom Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Canty v. OttoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kelsey v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Cooke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- M&T Bank v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024