Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1964No. 37199PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*261McDonald, judge.

The offense is rape; the punishment, life imprisonment in the state penitentiary.

The state has confessed error in this case for the reason that venue was not proved. Appellant made a motion for an instructed verdict upon the grounds that venue was not proved and made an issue during the trial of the case. Appellant has also brought forward this contention by formal bill of exception. This question is properly before us for review. We agree with the state’s position.

The issue having been properly raised in the trial court, we are not permitted to presume that venue was proven…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fairfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Ex Parte WatsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. State v. Blankenship, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API