Market & Fulton National Bank v. Jones
New York Supreme Court
Demurrer by defendant Jones to a certain portion of the amended complaint of the plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The plaintiffs, as judgment creditors of the Rheubottom & Teall Manufacturing Company, bring this action for the purpose of having declared fraudulent and void, as against their judgments, certain real estate and chattel mortgages executed by the above-named judgment debtor to the defendant Jones, and also certain judgments obtained by the defendants Rheubottom and Wright, and by them assigned to the defendants, the Rational Bank of Auburn and the State Bank of Syracuse. The complaint, in setting forth- the facts upon which the plaintiffs rely to obtain the relief sought, does not attempt to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wiles v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Paulding v. . the Chrome Steel CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Rochester Savings Bank v. . AverellNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Greenpoint Sugar Co. v. . WhitinNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Post v. DartNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Elias v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Hamilton Trust Co. v. ClemesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Beebe v. Richmond Light, Heat & Power Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
- Buxton v. Pennsylvania Lumber Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1914
- Glover v. EhrlichAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.