Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Trott Law, P.C.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 29, 2015No. Case No. 15-10747PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), “[a] debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt.” 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. ■ Nor may the debt collector “use unfair or unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect any debt.” 15 U.S.C. § 1692f.
Plaintiff Earl D. Wilson fell behind on his mortgage. The note holder hired the Trott law firm to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alexander v. CareSourceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Michael Durkin and Loretta Reed, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Equifax Check Services, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Barany-Snyder v. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Wysocki v. International Business MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kolbasyuk ex rel. Situated v. Capital Mgmt. Servs., LPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Martin v. Trott Law, P.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Calogero v. Shows, Cali & Walsh, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Dolegiewicz v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- FIKE v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.