Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States

MollisoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement are before me on an order of remand by the second division of this court, reported as United States v. Freedman & Slater, Inc., 35 Cust. Ct. 456, A. R. D. 64. The order of remand was not limited, but was stated to be “for all purposes.”

The state of the record up to the time of the remand is as set forth in the writer's previous opinion, reported as Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 438, Reap. Dec. 8274, and need not be set forth again here.

At the hearing on remand, certain corrections of typographical errors were made in…