Gilbert Equipment Co., Inc. v. Higgins
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE
PITTMAN, Senior District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the recommendation of the magistrate made under 28 U.S. C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this court.
An analysis considering the plaintiff’s objections and the reasons for this court adopting the magistrate’s recommendation are set forth herein.
ANALYSIS:
1. Gilbert argues that the magistrate improperly…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gun South, Inc. v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Thomas A. Demko and Penn Arms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Citizens for the Scenic Severn River Bridge, Inc. v. SkinnerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1991
- Sierra Nevada Forest Protection Campaign v. ReyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Gun South, Inc. v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.