Legal Opinion · Dissent

Warnecke v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1959Published

1Dissent

Hofstadter, J. P.

(dissenting). I dissent.

My colleagues hold that a wide-open concrete floor on the eighth story of a building under construction was as a matter of law, not dangerous to plaintiff — a workman required to walk back and forth on the floor, stacking angle irons — despite the fact that imbedded at intervals throughout the concrete there were temporary metal sleeves two and one-half inches in diameter and protruding three or four inches from the floor (to permit pipes eventually to pass through the floor). My brethren also find plaintiff — 56 years old at the time of the accident —…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Greany v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Semanchuck v. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Nelson v. NygrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Dollard v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Schumer v. CaplinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API