Legal Opinion

Alamo v. Kijakazi

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 21, 2025No. 3:21-cv-01587Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ISMAEL ALAMO, : CIVIL CASE NO. Plaintiff, : 3:21-CV-1587 (JCH) : v. : : COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL : SECURITY, : MAY 21, 2025 Defendant. : RULING ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES (DOC. NO. 24) I. INTRODUCTION Ivan M. Katz, (“Attorney Katz”), attorney for Ismael Alamo (“plaintiff”), moves for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 406(b) of title 42 of the United States Code. Attorney Katz seeks $59,742.50, which represents twenty-five percent of the total past due benefits awarded to the plaintiff. See Motion for Allowance of Attorney’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Dale Wells, William Hlywa v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appeal of John S. HoggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Fields v. KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  4. Rodriguez v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API