Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Mullen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 19, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice/ Parker, Minturn, Kalisctt, Black, Kays, JJ. 6.

For reversal — Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, JJ. 5.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grossman v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  2. Warner, Etc., Admrs. v. Keiser, Etc., Exrs.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. TURRO EX REL. TURRO v. TurroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Dill v. DillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  5. Nat., C., Lyndhurst v. Rutherford Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API