Legal Opinion

Inglis v. Rymer

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 12, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

Pursuant to its asserted charter powers granted by Sections 33 and 37 of Chapter 14439, Special Acts of 1929, Laws of Florida, the City of Vero Beach enacted an ordinance reading as follows:

“An Ordinance Prohibiting the Operation of Skating Rinks within the Corporate Limits- of. the City of Vero Beach, Florida; and Prescribing Penalties for the Violation of this Ordinance.
“Whereas, the City-Council of the City of Vero Beach, .Florida, believes that it is detrimental to the peace, happipess, safety and well-being of the citizens .of Vero Beach, Florida, for the operation of skating rinks to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Friend v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Johnson v. Town of PhiladelphiaMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ex parte HarrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prior v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. STATE, BD. OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND v. Day Cruise Assoc., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Carter v. Town of Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. National Container Corp. v. State Ex Rel. StocktonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API