Legal Opinion

Wild v. Vilsack

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided February 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-cv-01272-WJMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a Petition for Review of Agency Action (the “Petition”) challenging the U.S. Forest Service’s approval of the Handkerchief Mesa Timber Project, which authorized logging in certain areas of the Rio Grande National Forest in southwestern Colorado. The matter has been fully briefed (ECF No. 24, 26, 31), and Respondents (the “Forest Service”) have submitted the administrative record to the Court (ECF No. 23). On December 6, 2011, the Court held oral argument on the Petition. (ECF No. 50.) After carefully…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
Davis v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
Utahns for Better Transportation v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.