Legal Opinion

Voorhees v. Kings Co. Elevated Railroad

New York City Court

Decided February 15, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff on the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Clement, Ch. J.

The plaintiff was a passenger on defendant’s train, and while seated, placed his right arm on the sill of the open window, which suddenly fell and struck his little linger, whereby he sustained an injury. Plaintiff, on his direct-examination, testified that he knew that the window, prior to its fall, was held by the catch, but on cross-examination admitted that he knew nothing about it except that the window was up. It is just as probable that the window was not raised to the proper height as that the catch was defective. A passenger on an elevated car should either not place…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strembel v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Boice v. Ulster & Delaware RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API