Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Duck (In Re Borelli)

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 4, 1991No. C-91-1753 MHP, Bankruptcy No. 3-90-0417 TCPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATEL, District Judge.

This is an appeal of a bankruptcy court order denying appellant Dickinson’s motion to remand and abstain. This court questioned the nature of review of the bankruptcy court’s order in light of the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990. For the reasons set forth below, this court finds it has appellate jurisdiction over the order of the Bankruptcy Court.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case was originally filed as a class action in San Francisco County Superior Court. The complaint alleged state common law claims arising out of the embezzlement and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Blackburn v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Northern Ohio (In Re GF Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
  5. McDevitt & Street Co. v. Hammons/Clark Partnership No. 1 (In Re Clark)District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eastman v. Eastman (In Re Eastman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. C & A, S.E. v. Puerto Rico Solid Waste Management AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Drake (In Re Ramada Inn-Paragould General Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992
  4. MacLeod v. Dalkon Shield TrustDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
  5. McVey v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API