Legal Opinion

Probst v. Braeunlich

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1884PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts oí the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.-

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, Judge:

This is a writ of error to an order of the circuit court of Wetzel county allowed on the petition of the plaintiff in an action of ■assumpsit brought by Theophile Probst* against Charles F. Braeunlich and' Amos Brast, partners, &c. A trial was held by jury and a'verdict returned for the plaintiff for one'hundred and ninety-'four dollars and seventy-foiir cents, which'on the motion of the defendants was set aside and a new trial awarded. The defendants hied in support of their motion to set aside the verdict because it was contrary to the law and the evidence, the joint affidavit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. RobinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Reynolds v. TompkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Miller v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Shrewsbury v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coalmer v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bartlett v. PattonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. State v. PorterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. ScotchelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. CobbsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API