Legal Opinion

Englemann v. Reuse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Macomb. (Stevens, J.) Bill filed for an accounting, etc. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in opinion and summarized in head-note.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

The bill in this case was filed to determine the sum due on a mortgage made in.February, 1881, by complainant to Desiderius Collaert, for $3,500, and interest, which was assigned by the mortgagee to defendant. It is agreed that the defendant holds it on the same equities as the mortgagee. Complainant claims that it should be reduced by the amount of $556 and interest. A payment reducing the principal by $1,600 is not in controversy. This $556 is the amount of a prior mortgage on the same property held by David Trombley, and was in the hands of Joseph Kuhn to pay to Trombley whenever he would…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walker v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Atlantic Life Ins. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. Moore v. BlackburnWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Schuling v. ErvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. May v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API