Legal Opinion

Gothard v. Gothard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 26, 2007No. 1D06-3005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarfield, J.

We hold that the trial court erred as a matter of law in finding that it had no subject matter jurisdiction to consider a complaint for civil theft, “[bjecause plaintiff did not wait the required thirty (30) days before filing suit.” Section 722.11, Florida Statutes, requires that a person, “[bjefore filing an action under this section” seeking treble damages for civil theft “must make a written demand for payment,” and provides that if the person to whom the written demand is made complies within thirty days after receiving the demand, “that person shall be given a written release from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Naturally Beautiful Nails, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (In Re Naturally Beautiful Nails, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JT v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. M.B.K. Sales, LLC. v. Designs By FMC, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API