Legal Opinion

The Matter of Jesse Friedman v. Kathleen M. Rice

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2017No. 56Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 56 In the Matter of Jesse Friedman, Appellant, v. Kathleen M. Rice, &c., Respondent. Ronald L. Kuby, for appellant. Judith R. Sternberg, for respondent. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al.; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al.; District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, amici curiae. RIVERA, J.: On this appeal we clarify the proper interpretation of section 87 (2) (e) (iii) of our…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. United States Department of Justice v. LandanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API