Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. Co. v. Ralston

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1933No. 688PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

A rehearing was granted in order to examine more closely into that part of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act § 1 (45 US CA § 51), which imposes liability upon interstate carriers for injuries “resulting in whole or in part from the negligence” of their employees. The controlling authorities cited in the petition for rehearing convince us that the question of whether plaintiff’s injury resulted “in whole or in part” from the fireman’s negligence in failing to obey the signal to stop, which plaintiff now testifies he gave, was for the jury to determine, and the last…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. GotschallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Davis v. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Slattery v. Marra Bros., Inc. Marra Bros., Inc. v. Wm. Spencer & Son CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Loftin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Thomson v. BolesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Clay County Cotton Co. v. Home Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API