Legal Opinion

State v. Blea

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2018No. A-1-CA-34986Published

1Opinion of the Court

VIGIL, Judge.

{1} Defendant Joseph Blea was convicted of multiple counts of first degree criminal sexual penetration and first degree kidnapping involving four separate victims in two separate district court cases, and appeals. In both appeals, cause no. A-1-CA-34986 and A-1-CA-35085, Defendant contends that New Mexico's DNA Identification Act (the Act) NMSA 1978, §§ 29-16-1 to -13 (1997, as amended through 2013) is unconstitutional on its face, and on our own motion we consolidated the appeals. We hold that the Act is not unconstitutional on its face, and summarily reject Defendant's…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API