Poccia v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In our opinion the verdict was excessive. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., concurs in the reversal of the judgment, but otherwise dissents and votes to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: There was here no such propinquity of the negligence of the two defendants, that we may say that the negligence of the City of New York was the proximate cause of the accident. It was indeed the causa sine qua non but the negligence of the driver of the automobile which struck the boy was the causa causans of the accident. There was here no “unbroken…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Trapp v. McClellanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lopez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Filancia v. Town of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Lopez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Zarillo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958