Legal Opinion

Poccia v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In our opinion the verdict was excessive. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., concurs in the reversal of the judgment, but otherwise dissents and votes to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: There was here no such propinquity of the negligence of the two defendants, that we may say that the negligence of the City of New York was the proximate cause of the accident. It was indeed the causa sine qua non but the negligence of the driver of the automobile which struck the boy was the causa causans of the accident. There was here no “unbroken…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trapp v. McClellanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lopez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Filancia v. Town of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. Lopez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  4. Zarillo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API