Legal Opinion

Funk v. Kempton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 25, 1905No. Gen. No. 4,480PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Contest in court of probate. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston Count)'; the Hon. Colostin D. Myers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Vickers

delivered the opinion of the court.

Parker S. Kempton was engaged in the manufacture of drain tile and brick at Budd, Illinois. He commenced business in February, 1892, and conducted the same until December, 1893, in the name of P. S. Kempton. In December, 1893, appellant became a partner with P. S. Kemp-ton under a written contract, the provisions of which are not necessary to an understanding and decision of this case. In accordance with the agreement of the parties the business was continued,.in the same name and style as before, P. S. Kempton having exclusive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. LusherCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
  2. Kipp v. McChesneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Cartwright v. CartwrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Balcor Income Properties, Ltd. v. Arlen Realty, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Nussbaum v. KennedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Estate of Kempton v. FunkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  4. Funk v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  5. Estate of Kempton v. FunkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API