Torrington Drive-In v. I.A.T.S.E.M.P.M.O Local 402
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is a motion for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from picketing in front of the open air theater conducted by the plaintiff.
There is no dispute between the plaintiff and the one projectionist employed concerning wages, hours or working conditions. The defendant, however, claims the working conditions and wages are not comparable and are below the standards of other theaters in the community.
There is no question that the picketing is peaceful and that the signs carried simply state that "This theater does not employ members of Local 402, Motion Pictures Operators, A. F. of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262 v. GazzamSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hopkins v. Hamden Board of EducationConnecticut Superior Court · 1971
- Baron Consulting v. Complete Envt'l Test., No. Cv94-0245421 (Aug. 24, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Hopkins v. Hamden Board of EducationPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1971
- Housing Auth. of New Haven v. Riddick, No. Spnh 9607-47755 (Aug. 4, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.