Estrada v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft of property under the value of fifty dollars.

The State makes a case on the facts. The appellant most vigorously denies the accusation and the truth of the State’s case. This phase of the case, it occurs to us, is peculiarly one of fact which the jury has decided adversely to appellant. We would not feci justified in reversing for this reason under the condition of this record.

In motion in arrest of judgment appellant claims there is a variance between the allegations in the complaint and information with reference to the name of the…