Legal Opinion

Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co. v. Mueller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1913Published

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.— Eon. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.

—Plaintiff brought its action against defendant to recover on what it claimed to be *72a subscription for ten shares—$1000—of its capital stock. The petition, averring that Prank 0. Mueller, the defendant, and one Charles A. Mueller, were co-partners under the firm name of C. A. Mueller & Bro., sets out the facts connected with the incorporation and organization under the laws of Missouri, of the company plaintiff,. formed for the purpose of holding a World’s Pair at the city of St. Louis, in celebration of the centennial anniversary of the Louisiana Purchase; the signing of a certain agreement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Huling v. RollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Hargadine v. GibbonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Long v. StorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  4. Osborn v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Richardson v. MoiesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API