Legal Opinion

In re Hartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent George H. Hartman was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the Second Judicial Department *155on June 15, 1966 and at all times pertinent to this proceeding respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Respondent concedes that he neglected an ancillary probate proceeding, an estate proceeding and a divorce matter.

According to his physician, he is mentally incapacitated by depression from the practice of law. His counsel requested the Departmental Disciplinary Committee to initiate this proceeding under 22…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re DeullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API