Legal Opinion

Ecenrode v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 1991No. 90-1349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. We are urged to declare unconstitutional the “permitted range” in the sentencing guidelines statutory scheme on account of its vagueness. We decline to do so. Historically, in Florida and most jurisdictions, the judiciary are given the discretion to tailor a sentence appropriate to each defendant appearing in court. Recently, in Florida and some jurisdictions, the discretion of judges to impose appropriate sentences has been curtailed by sentencing guidelines statutes and rules. The “permitted range" in Florida’s sentencing guidelines is an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Harriel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Rowe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Burgess v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Speed v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Jules Ducas v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API