Ex parte Tweedy
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Application for Naturalization.
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The applicant presents a duly-authenticated certificate showing that on May 20, 1881, be declared his intention to become a citizen before the probate court of Shelby county, and the -question is whether that is a court “having common-law jurisdic*85tion,” as required by section 2165 of the Revi'sed Statutes of the United States. It seems to be settled that it is not necessary that the court should have general common-law jurisdiction; but if any part- of its jurisdiction answers that designation the requirement of the statute is fulfilled. U. S. v. Power, 14 Blatchf. 223; Ex parte Cregg, 2…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Irvine v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- In re ConnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Glasgow's Lessee v. Smith and BlackwellTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1805
- United States v. PowerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Levin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- In re WolfU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1911