Legal Opinion

Ex parte Tweedy

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided November 1, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application for Naturalization.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The applicant presents a duly-authenticated certificate showing that on May 20, 1881, be declared his intention to become a citizen before the probate court of Shelby county, and the -question is whether that is a court “having common-law jurisdic*85tion,” as required by section 2165 of the Revi'sed Statutes of the United States. It seems to be settled that it is not necessary that the court should have general common-law jurisdiction; but if any part- of its jurisdiction answers that designation the requirement of the statute is fulfilled. U. S. v. Power, 14 Blatchf. 223; Ex parte Cregg, 2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Irvine v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. In re ConnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Glasgow's Lessee v. Smith and BlackwellTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1805
  5. United States v. PowerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. In re WolfU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API