Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Colmore v. Uninsured Employers Fun

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2005No. 04-310Published

1Concurrence

CHIEF JUSTICE GRAY,

specially concurring.

¶45 I join the Court’s opinion on issue one. I concur in the Court’s resolution of issue two, but not in all that is said in that regard. In addition, with due respect for the dissent’s understandable desire that Mrs. Forgey receive the benefit to which she would have been entitled under different circumstances because of the erroneous original calculation of benefits by the UEF, I cannot agree with the analysis presented to reach such a conclusion. Moreover, while the dissent presents many arguments not raised by Mrs. Forgey, I address portions of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gomez v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re M.B.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Matter of MBMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hand v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API