Legal Opinion
United States v. James Henry Clark
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2002No. 00-6428PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMPSON, District Judge.
Defendant-Appellant James Henry Clark (“Clark”) appeals his conviction and sentence for bank robbery on the grounds that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, because he was insane at the time of the commission of the offense, and (2) the district court erred in applying a two level enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F)(2000) for making a threat of death during the commission of the crime. Finding no merit to these contentions, we AFFIRM both the conviction and the sentence.
I. FACTS
On June 22,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) and George Mooneyham (89-5710)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Michael PriceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. James A. KimesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Ernest AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Norman P. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Anthony SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Louis Steven PethoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael Dewayne WinbushCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. James WootenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.