Legal Opinion

Warner v. Kansas City Star Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1987No. WD 37530PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Judge.

Plaintiff Gary D. Warner had a jury verdict for $200,000 compensatory damages on his libel claim against the Kansas City Star Company, and $75,000 punitive damages. The trial court set the verdict aside and entered judgment for defendant on the ground that plaintiff had failed to prove defendant’s actual malice in publishing the alleged libel and hence had failed to make a submissible case. Plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff had been the outdoor editor of the defendant newspaper, who was discharged by the newspaper for the alleged violation of the newspaper’s rule against…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. San Antonio Express News v. Dracos, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  2. Live Oak Publishing Co. v. CohaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Wayment v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. COCKRAM v. Genesco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Doe v. McFarlaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API