Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Belle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon discovering that claimant served as a Councilman for the Town of Camillus in Onondaga County during the period of time he collected unemployment insurance benefits, the Board issued a decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed. Claimant concedes that he served as Councilman during the period at issue but asserts that the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence because, inter alia, his service as Councilman did not constitute employment. Inasmuch as the evidence is undisputed that claimant received…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of SalisburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SilversteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of CassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re the Claim of GeracitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of BurkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API