Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Graves

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1873PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Complaint to a trial justice, charging the defendant with larceny. At the close of the examination before the trial justice the defendant was ordered to recognize with sufficient sureties for his appearance before the Superior Court at its next term. Failing to comply with this order, he was committed to jail.

Read the full summary

Complaint to a trial justice, charging the defendant with larceny. At the close of the examination before the trial justice the defendant was ordered to recognize with sufficient sureties for his appearance before the Superior Court at its next term. Failing to comply with this order, he was committed to jail. At the next term of the Superior Court, and while the complaint was pending before the grand jury, on motion of the district attorney, it was ordered by the court that the defendant be discharged and gc without day. From this order the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The defendant is not legally aggrieved by his discharge from custody, and therefore cannot appeal from the order of discharge. Appeal dismissed.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
  2. Smith v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Schaaf v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bangs v. ParkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
  5. Randol v. GaroutteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API