Legal Opinion

Adamcik v. Knight

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1943No. 9302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, chief justice.

Adamcik sued Knight for damages to an automobile resulting from a collision between the automobile and a horse belong-ihg to Knight allegedly roaming at large unattended, on a fenced designated state highway in violation of Art. 1370a, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., which provides: “Any person ownifig or having control of any horse * * * who permits the same to traverse or roam at large, unattended, on the • right-of-way of any designated State Highway in this State where the same' is enclosed by fences on both sides shall be guilty of a misdemeanor * *

The trial was to a jury. At…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hansen v. KemmishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Kenney v. AntonettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fugett v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Doherty v. SweetserNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beck v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hinkle v. SiltamakiWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Dorman v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Davis v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Hanna v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API