Legal Opinion
Setauket Development Corp. v. Romeo
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnthony M. Livoti, J.
This is a proceeding brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review and annul the determination of the denial of two special use permits of the Board of Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven, the respondents herein, in accordance with article XI-A (§ 1150, subd. C) of the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Brookhaven, for the construction, erection, operation and occupancy of an indoor theatre and for the construction, erection, operation and occupancy of a bowling alley, upon the grounds that denial by respondents of both applications is illegal, invalid, arbitrary,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Three Village Corners Shopping Center Inc. v. LangeNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Three Village Corners Shopping Center, Inc. v. LangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963