Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1950No. 16897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

The first question presented is whether or not the general demurrer to the petition was properly overruled. The Code provides:' “Equity will not interfere with regular administration of estates, except upon the application of the representative, either, first for construction and direction, second for marshaling the assets; or upon application of any person interested in the estate where there is danger of loss or other injury to his interests.” Code, § 37-403. Section 113-2203 provides: “A court of equity shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the ordinary over the settlement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. McCord v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Hoffman v. ChesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Spooner v. Bank of DonalsonvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Wade v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Johns v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Swann v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Hileman v. HulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Leonas v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API