City of Union Gap v. Department of Ecology
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
¶1 The owner of a water right relinquishes that right to the state if the water right is not used beneficially for five years. But the owner does not relinquish that right, despite nonuse, if it is claimed for some “determined future development” or for “municipal water supply purposes.” Here, a developer bought water rights, intending to sell them to a city. We conclude that the sale did not take place within the required five-year period before the developer relinquished the water rights. Nor did the developer satisfy the requirements of either the “determined future development” or the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crown West Realty, LLC v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Burbank Irrigation District 4 v. Dep't Of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023