Hooper v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
This is an appeal from a conviction for sale of marihuana. Punishment was assessed by the jury at ten years.
Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction in that the undercover agent was an accomplice and his testimony relative to purchasing marihuana from appellant required corroboration.
B. G. Adams, a narcotic agent for the Department of Public Safety, testified that appellant approached him while he was sitting in his car in front of a pool hall on Fifth Street in Mineral Wells on the night of November 3, 1970 and said, “Hey,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ochoa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Gomez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Brock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- DeMary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tibbetts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Perez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973