Legal Opinion

Notini v. Heckler

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 10, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-3205-YPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, John Notini (“Notini”) and Winifred Notini, brought this action to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) denying them Social Security Retirement benefits for the years 1979, 1980, and 1981. The Secretary found that John Notini had “excess earnings” for these years. The Notinis argue that this decision is not supported by substantial evidence. As there are no disputed issues of material fact, both sides have moved for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.

I

Albert H. Notini…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leslie A. Ludeking v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. Letz v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  3. Bryan v. MathewsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
  4. Ruth S. Weisenfeld v. Elliott J. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taubenfeld v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1988
  2. Johnson v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. John F. Johnson v. Shirley S. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API