Legal Opinion
US EX REL. JOHNSON PUGH MECH. v. Landmark Const. Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 21, 2004No. CIV.01-B-2406(BNB)Published
1Opinion of the Court
318 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2004)
THE UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of JOHNSON PUGH MECHANICAL, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and The Mountbatten Surety Co., Inc., Defendants,
Doug Pourier, William Clary, Kathleen Clary, and PI Construction Corporation, Third-party Defendants.
No. CIV.01-B-2406(BNB).
United States District Court, D. Colorado.
May 21, 2004.
David L. Shakes, Hendricks, Hendricks & Shakes, P.C., Colorado Springs, CO, for Plaintiff.
Mike F. Pipkin, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP, Dallas, TX, for Defendants, Cross-Claimant and Third-Party Plaintiff.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fish v. EastCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- JW Bateson Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Bd. of Trustees of Nat. Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Lane v. Maryhaven Center of HopeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- National State Bank of Newark v. Terminal Const. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.