IP Innovation L.L.C. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOCORAS, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the motion of Defendant Lexmark International, Inc. (“Lexmark”) to transfer this matter to the Eastern District of Kentucky pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
Plaintiffs IP Innovation LLC and Technology Licensing Corp. (collectively referred to herein as “IP Innovation”) own two patents related to computer printers. In March 2003, IP Innovation filed the instant suit, accusing Minolta, Brother Industries, Canon, Seiko Epson, Hewlett-Packard, and Lexmark of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Amoco Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- First National Bank v. El Camino Resources, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006