Komorowski v. Kozicki
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue raised upon this appeal is whether the acts of the appellant’s insured, which allegedly caused the injuries complained of, constituted acts of “loading or unloading” and were within the coverage of the policy.
It is of paramount importance in these cases to note that the causal negligence of the appellant’s insured (i.e., the negligence of Donald Kittell) has not as yet been determined and that in determining the appellant’s liability for the negligence of its insured two distinct questions are involved: (1) Did the acts complained of cause the injuries; and (2) were such acts…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stammer v. KitzmillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Zimmer v. DaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Ermis v. Federal Windows Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Peterson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Concrete Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Amery Motor Co. v. CoreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Continental National Insurance v. Carriers InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Keller v. SchusterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Austin-White Ex Rel. Skow v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.