Mohawk National Bank v. Schenectady Bank
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by the Mohawk National Bank of Schenectady against the-Schenectady Bank to compel a transfer of stock. There was a judgment in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals. ' Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtMayham, P. J.
This action was prosecuted to compel the defendant to transfer upon its stock books 37 shares of the capital stock of the defendant, of the par value of $50 per share. The stock was held by one Paige, and stood in his name upon the books of the defendant, and was represented by a certificate issued by the defendant to him on the 10th day of July, 1868. The plaintiff claims title to the certificate and stock represented by it by virtue of a bill of sale and assignment and power of attorney executed by Paige, dated the 18th of September, 1876, claimed to have been given by ■ Paige to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Union Bank of Georgetown v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- President of the Bank of Utica v. SmalleyNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- Driscoll v. . West Bradley C.M. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Leggett v. . the Bank of Sing SingNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Bank of Attica v. . Manufacturers' and Traders' BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.