Legal Opinion
Ochs v. Federal Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 30, 1982PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
CLIFFORD, J.
The court below, with one judge dissenting, interpreted the limitations provision in the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (No Fault Act), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-11 to -16, differently from another panel of the Appellate Division in Danilla v. Leatherby Insurance Co., 168 N.J.Super. 515 (1979). Inasmuch as we agree with the Danilla approach, we reverse.
I
On November 10, 1974, while riding his motorcycle, plaintiff, Christian J. Ochs, was involved in an accident with an automobile. As a result plaintiff was seriously injured and underwent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Farrell v. Votator Division of Chemetron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Kaczmarek v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Hoglin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Harlan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Gantes v. Kason Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Aponte-Correa v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Grunwald v. BronkeshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- W v. Pangborne & Co. v. New Jersey Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.