Legal Opinion

Bollen v. Woodhams

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 5, 1920No. 9615PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. Henry J. Hersey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

This was a suit by Bollen, plaintiff below, against Wood-hams and the Bonding Company on an injunction bond. The court sustained defendant’s motion to strike the replication as a sham, and for judgment on the pleadings, and plaintiff brings error.

The third defense in the answer was a plea of res adjudicator.. It alleged a previousi judgment in plaintiff’s favor, on the same bond, for damages caused by the same injunction, and satisfaction of such judgment. A demurrer to this plea was overruled.

If the replication was a sham it was properly stricken out, and then, if the answer was good (and it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweet v. BarnardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. United Telephone Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1973
  2. Colboch v. Aviation Credit CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API